V for Vendetta by Alan Moore & David Lloyd
Back a few decades, my best friend started to get into graphic novels. The genre was really beginning to explode, but it never interested me. I felt then – and still do – that you either have to focus on the art or the story but it’s difficult to do both. Inevitably, the visual tends to overshadow the literary, and while some might argue that this is why it is a separate or unique genre, it just doesn’t work for me.
Part of the fun of your children getting older is that as they enter their teens there’s an opportunity for them to begin sharing with you some of the things they’re discovering. Musically, this can be a challenge as my oldest son really likes rap! Fortunately though, I grounded him in the classics of rock and roll as well, and so we can talk about what he’s listening to. Similarly with books. And while the kids really enjoyed various comic-style books over the years (Asterix & Obelix, Bone, etc.), for the first time I’ve read something more substantive that my son picked up at the library the other day – V is for Vendetta.
I watched a good chunk of the movie without sound on some plane flight at some point, but didn’t realize it came from a graphic novel. I can’t say that I was overly impressed, and therefore my opinion of graphic novels as a whole remains the same. The story line is interesting, but predictably (to me) the story and character development is rather shallow.
The setting is in the 1990’s in a post-apocalyptic Britain that has become a totalitarian state in the aftermath of atomic warfare that wiped out most of Europe and Africa. The titular character – V – is never unmasked in the novel, but wears several different masks, the most common of which is a lightly colored Guy Fawkes mask. He saves a young woman from police brutality and disciples her in the ways of anarchy.
However it’s a very idealistic anarchy, to say the least. V is strong, resolute, moral in a brutal sort of way. He’s literate and enlightened thanks to forced drug therapies at a concentration camp years earlier that probably also contributed to his physical prowess. He wages a one-man war against the totalitarian government, leading towards a breakdown in control and the beginnings of a popular uprising against the State. V’s murderous violence is clothed in the righteousness of a holy warrior against a completely evil and unjust State. He opines that anarchy has two elements, one destructive and one creative, and that the destructive element should be renounced and abandoned as soon as the status quo is overthrown. But we don’t see that in the book – much as we don’t see it historically or in real life, either. The truth is it’s hard to put away the bombs and the bombers, as they often find themselves as the new government. While V does not find himself in this predicament, it’s a historical reality.
There are bad systems that should be raged against, undoubtedly, but the book doesn’t dwell on the reality of the human condition – that I identify as sin – which ensures that no matter how virtuous or benign the ruling system may be, it will inevitably become corrupted and co-opted by people driven to utilize the system to achieve personal ends and needs.
The novel glorifies the fight, and pictures it as inevitably victorious. But it doesn’t deal with the aftermath and the struggle to replace a corrupt system with something better. Nor does it deal with the individualistic nature of anarchy, which means that just because one system is overthrown doesn’t mean there will be a mutually agreeable replacement.
I’ve enjoyed talking through the book some with my son and hope to do more of it. I look forward to his continued explorations in literature and the world around him.
Leave a Reply