When I was a kid, we couldn’t afford to purchase school lunches. Every day I brought my lunch to school in a pretty cool lunch box. My preferred sandwich was peanut butter and jelly. I ate that pretty much every school day for lunch from as far back as I can remember to sometime probably in late high school when I started working and could afford to – from time to time – eat out.
I never really gave this much thought. Some people could afford to buy school lunches, just like some people – once we hit junior high and high school age – could afford to buy shakes and french fries and other luxuries for lunch. It was a reality of my life. Yes, it meant I wasn’t part of the in crowd (although there were plenty of other, non-economic reasons why I would never be invited into that hallowed clique). I learned to deal with that. As generations of kids did before me and after me.
Yet politicians today are outraged that not everyone can afford to buy school lunches. Or some people sign their kids up for them but then fall behind in their payments, racking up debts with the school. This has apparently been handled up till now by those children getting a “cheaper, alternative” lunch. And this stigmatizes them. They stick out from their peers who can afford the pricier lunches, or can afford to have the luxury of choosing what they want to eat for lunch instead of just having something handed to them.
Note that everyone is getting a lunch. But some get to choose what they have for lunch while others are denied a choice, or their choice is less desirable.
So our state has decided to eliminate the stigma for these children by assuring that all kids – whether their parents can afford to pay their lunch debts off or not – get the same lunch. No mention is made in the article about how this decision will be paid for. I presume it will be paid for with yet another sob-story appeal to the voters about how the school systems can’t make ends meet and need more money in taxes and bonds to ensure all children receive a quality education.
Seems as though education is in order, indeed.
Starting with the hard, cold reality – both present and historical – that some people make more than others. Some people have more than others. In my studies of history, this has always been the case. Even including efforts at socialism and communism in the 20th century, a basic fact of life is that some people are always going to be a little better off than others. Or a lot. Whether they’re supposed to be or not. That’s the way life works.
Yet news stories today present this as though it’s some sort of newly discovered corruption in our society. Did you know that some people can afford to buy portable generators when faced with possible power outages? Did you know this is evidence of income disparity?! Wait – you mean some people live paycheck to paycheck? How is it that reporters and politicians are so surprised by this? For pretty much all of my life, myself and the vast majority of people I’ve known live more or less paycheck to paycheck. We don’t have vast sums of money in the bank. Sometimes we have a little more. Sometimes a little less.
But we live in a country founded on the principle that if you worked hard, you could improve your situation. You might start out with not much, but you could try to do better. It wasn’t handed to you. It wasn’t paid for by other people. But you had the chance to try and improve your lot in life. Generations of people have done just that. Millions of people from around the world have undertaken great risk and expense to come to our country because of that principle. And many, many, many of them have found that principle isn’t just a nice marketing gimmick. It’s true. They’re witnesses to it, and that reality is what continues to fuel the desire to come to our country.
That’s not good enough for our politicians, apparently.
Maybe more of them needed to bring their lunches to school. Maybe more of them needed to deal with the fact that some people don’t eat fancy lunches every day at school. Some people don’t wear the latest designer fashions to school every day. Some people aren’t invited to the cool parties and hang out with the popular kids every day. That income disparity is just one of the pervasive realities of life, and despite good (or bad) intentions to the contrary, is amazingly difficult (or impossible) to eliminate.
Now that lunches are free, I guess we can move on to mandating a fashion fund so kids with parents who can’t afford to shop at all the cool stores aren’t stigmatized by having to wear off-brand clothing. Maybe another fund to help poor families buy nicer cars so they don’t stand out when they’re dropping off and picking up junior from school. The list could go on and on.
Life is not fair. Not in income and not in a stunning variety of other ways. Kids can be very cruel, it’s true. And if it isn’t school lunches, it will be something else where they demonstrate this truth generation after generation.
Because the real issue isn’t school lunches or portable generators or even income disparity as a whole. The real problem, the real root of cruelty and social and economic stratification is sin. Brokenness that can’t be legislated away. Sin that can’t be taxed out of existence. We have to be saved from it, but the government isn’t up to that task. Never has been. Isn’t now. Never will be. We can seek to make improvements, to be sure. And I know that good intentions are at the basis of writing about income disparity and trying to give free lunches to everyone. But what we really need is a God willing to enter into our world to save us from the sin we can’t always see and sometimes don’t want to get rid of, as well as the sin we’d be happy to do without. Jesus has done this. My state – or Federal – government can’t. They can’t fix the level of brokenness that leads to hurt feelings and social stigmatization. At best, they can try to give away more free lunches.
But that’s something I learned in school as well, along with the fact that some people have more money than others. There’s no such thing as a free lunch in this world. Somebody, somewhere, always pays.
Leave a Reply